Agentic FinTech Survey

Agentic FinTech: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Agents in Finance in the Era of LLMs

Yaxiong Wu
wuyashon@gmail.com
Yixuan Li
yixuanli9602@gmail.com

As large language models (LLMs) evolve from passive text generators into autonomous financial agents with perception, planning, memory, and tool use, a new paradigm—Agentic FinTech—is emerging. This survey formalizes the paradigm by addressing three core questions: what Agentic FinTech is, why it matters, and how such systems can be built and evaluated. We characterize Agentic FinTech through key agentic capabilities, including market-grounded perception, risk-aware planning under constraints, tool use over heterogeneous financial data, long-horizon memory of prior experience, and self-improvement driven by feedback and objectives. From the perspectives of automation and autonomy, we explain why the transition toward agentic systems is essential for next-generation financial intelligence. To support practical implementation and evaluation, we review major financial application domains (e.g., trading, risk management, and regulatory compliance), summarize advances in financial agents in terms of workflows, architectures, and optimizations, and discuss evaluation methodologies, open challenges, and future research directions toward scalable, trustworthy, and efficient agentic financial systems.

The Importance of Agentic FinTech
Figure 1: The Importance of Agentic FinTech.

Evolution of FinTech

FinTech 1.0 (Conventional FinTech / Digitalization) focuses on digitizing traditional financial services using Information Technologies (IT), such as Cloud Computing, Big Data and Blockchain. This stage primarily improves operational efficiency and accessibility, while financial logic remains rule-based and human-driven.

FinTech 2.0 (AI-Powered FinTech / Intelligentization) introduces Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), and Large Language Models (LLMs) into financial workflows. AI models are used to enhance prediction, personalization, and automation in tasks such as credit assessment, fraud detection, trading, and customer service, yet most systems function as decision-support tools with limited autonomy.

FinTech 3.0 (Agentic FinTech / Autonomization) represents a paradigm shift toward autonomous, goal-driven financial systems. This stage integrates financial-domain LLMs, AI agents with perception, planning, memory and tool-use capabilities, as well as agent interaction protocols (e.g., MCP, A2A, Agent Skills), enabling end-to-end task execution, multi-agent coordination, and adaptive decision-making under dynamic market and regulatory constraints.

Evolution of FinTech
Figure 2: Evolution of FinTech.

Agentic FinTech

To establish a clear conceptual foundation, we formally define Agentic FinTech as follows.

Definition: Agentic FinTech

Agentic FinTech represents a new paradigm of financial technology systems that leverage LLM-powered agents to automate financial workflows, enabling them to autonomously perceive financial information, plan under complex market contexts, invoke prior experience, make multi-step decisions, interact with users, and continuously self-improve through feedback from their operating environments to achieve specific financial objectives.

Agentic FinTech
Figure 3: Overview of Agentic FinTech.

Automation & Autonomy

Automation. The introduction of intelligent automation yields several concrete benefits for financial systems:

  1. Operational Efficiency: automatically handling repetitive and data-intensive tasks to reduce operational costs, lower error rates, and shorten decision cycles.
  2. Enhanced Service Quality: improving user-facing financial services through faster responses, more personalized financial assistance, and continuous service availability.
  3. Human-Workforce Augmentation: allowing financial professionals to reallocate their efforts from routine operations toward higher-value analytical and strategic work.

Collectively, these benefits demonstrate that intelligent automation transforms FinTech from rule-based task execution into scalable and adaptive financial operations capable of meeting real-time, data-rich demands.

Autonomy. The autonomy introduced by such agents yields several key benefits:

  1. Proactive Risk Mitigation: continuous monitoring and early intervention in high-stakes domains such as risk management, auditing, and fraud detection, supporting timely and compliant actions under uncertainty.
  2. Expanded Financial Inclusion: extending financial services to underserved populations via automated credit assessment and micro-finance operations.
  3. Closed-Loop Adaptive Decision-Making: autonomously planning, acting, and refining strategies through closed feedback loops, enabling end-to-end financial workflows that adjust to evolving market signals, regulatory updates, and data drift without relying on pre-specified rules.

Collectively, these benefits transform FinTech into a collaborative, human-in-the-loop ecosystem and extend the field from static automation toward proactive financial intelligence, marking a shift toward continuously learning and self-improving financial ecosystems.

Implementation of Agentic FinTech

This section discusses practical pathways for implementing Agentic FinTech systems. We focus on three complementary dimensions of implementation: (1) Workflows across different financial application scenarios, illustrating how agents can be embedded into end-to-end financial processes; (2) Architectures, covering both single-agent and multi-agent architectures that enable autonomous perception, reasoning, and collaboration ; and (3) Optimizations, which involves both non-parametric (such as prompt refinement and reflection) and parametric (such as RL) optimization strategies to ensure adaptive, efficient, and robust system behavior in dynamic financial environments.

Table 1: Implementation of Agentic FinTech.
Method Category Framework Key Feature Link
TradingAgents Trading Multi-Agent Role Specialization GitHub
NOFX Trading Multi-Agent Role Specialization GitHub
AlphaQuanter Trading Single-Agent Tool-Orchestrated Agentic RL GitHub
R&D-Agent(Q) Trading Multi-Agent Factor-Model Co-Evolving GitHub
QuantEvolve Trading Multi-Agent Evolutionary Optimization GitHub
AlphaAgent Trading Multi-Agent Decay-Resistant Alpha Mining GitHub
CryptoTrade Trading Multi-Agent Reflective Decision Refinement GitHub
StockAgent Trading Multi-Agent Stock Trading Simualtion GitHub
ContestTrade Trading Multi-Agent Internal Contest Mechanisms GitHub
FLAG-TRADER Trading Single-Agent Gradient-based RL Site
AI Hedge Fund Trading Multi-Agent Role Specialization GitHub
MM-DREX Trading Multi-Agent SFT-RL for Router & Experts -
DeepFund Trading Multi-Agent Role Specialization GitHub
TradingGroup Trading Multi-Agent Self-Reflection -
ATLAS Trading Multi-Agent Prompt Optimization -
CGA-Agent Trading Multi-Agent Genetic Algorithms -
AICrypto-Assistant Trading Multi-Agent Router & Specialists -
TiMi Trading Multi-Agent Hierarchical Optimization -
P1GPT Trading Multi-Agent Structured Reasoning Pipeline -
MarketSenseAI 2.0 Trading Multi-Agent Chain-of-Agents Site
FinMem Trading Multi-Agent Adjustable Cognitive Memory GitHub
FinWorld Multiple Multi-Agent All-in-One Platform GitHub
QuantMind IR Multi-Agent Extraction & Retrieval GitHub
FinSearch IR Multi-Agent Planner & Executor GitHub
MASCA Credit Multi-Agent Multidimensional Assessment -
Ryt AI Service Multi-Agent Guardrails, Intent, & Action Site
TS-Agent Forecasting Multi-Agent Code Base & Refinement -
FinRpt-Gen Reporting Multi-Agent Extraction & Analysis GitHub
ValueCell Reporting Multi-Agent Deep Research GitHub
FinDebate Reporting Multi-Agent Safe Debate Protocol -
FinRobot Reporting Multi-Agent Financial Chain-of-Thought GitHub
FinTeam Reporting Multi-Agent Role Specialization GitHub
MS-Agent FinResearch Reporting Multi-Agent Deep Research GitHub
FinSight Reporting Multi-Agent Deep Research -
Coinvisor Reporting Multi-Agent RL-based Tool Selection GitHub
FinPos Risk Multi-Agent Position-Aware Trading -
Risk Analyst Risk Multi-Agent Agentic Model Discovery Loop -
FinHEAR Risk Multi-Agent Adaptive Risk Modeling GitHub
FinRS Risk Multi-Agent Risk-Aware Reasoning -
M-SAEA Risk Multi-Agent Multi Safety-Aware Evaluation -
AuditAgent Fraud Multi-Agent Cross-Doc Fraud Discovery -
RCA Regulatory Multi-Agent Risk-Concealment Attacks GitHub
AlphaAgents Portfolio Multi-Agent Role Specialization -
FinCon Trading & Portfolio Multi-Agent Manager-Analyst Hierarchy & Dual-Level Risk Control GitHub
Wealth-Voyager Portfolio Multi-Agent Strategic Asset Allocation -
MACI Portfolio Multi-Agent Inter-/Intra-Team Collaboration -
MASS Portfolio Multi-Agent Optimal Investor Distribution GitHub
Overview of Agentic FinTech Architectures
Figure 4: Overview of Agentic FinTech Architectures.

Datasets & Benchmarks of Agentic FinTech

Table 2: Datasets & Benchmarks of Agentic FinTech.
Method Category Type Key Feature Link
Qlib Trading Platform Quantitative Investment GitHub
FinRL Trading Framework Financial RL Framework GitHub
InvestorBench Trading Benchmark Financial Decision Making GitHub
TradeTrap Trading Framework Stress-Testing Trading GitHub
TwinMarket Trading Simulation Stock Market Simulation GitHub
Agent Trading Arena Trading Simulation Virtual Zero-Sum Stock Market GitHub
DeepFund Trading Benchmark Real-Time Fund Investment GitHub
Agent Market Arena Trading Benchmark Live Multi-Market Trading Site
LiveTradeBench Trading Benchmark Live Trading Environment GitHub
FinRL-Meta Trading Benchmark Data-Driven Financial RL GitHub
FinLake-Bench Trading Benchmark Leakage-Robust Evaluation -
FINSABER Trading Framework Evaluating Trading Strategies GitHub
StockBench Trading Benchmark Stock Trading Decision-Making GitHub
FinTSB Forecasting Benchmark Time Series Forecasting GitHub
FinDeepForecastBench Forecasting Benchmark Forecasting at Corporate & Macro Levels Site
FinQA QA Dataset Numerical Reasoning GitHub
ConvFinQA QA Dataset Conversational Finance QA GitHub
FinEval 1.0 QA Benchmark Financial Domain Knowledge & Practical Abilities of LLMs GitHub
FinanceIQ QA Dataset Chinese Financial Knowledge GitHub
BizFinBench QA Benchmark Business-Driven Real-World Financial Benchmark GitHub
OmniEval QA Benchmark Omnidirectional & Automatic RAG in Finance Domain GitHub
FinAgentBench QA Benchmark Agentic Retrieval with Multi-Step Reasoning in Financial QA -
FinSearchComp QA Benchmark Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning Site
FinRAGBench-V QA Benchmark Visual RAG in Finance GitHub
VisFinEval QA Benchmark Chinese Financial Knowledge GitHub
MME-Finance QA Benchmark Bilingual Multimodal Financial QA for Expert-level Reasoning GitHub
FinRpt Reporting Benchmark Equity Research Report (ERR) Generation Site
FinDocResearch Reporting Benchmark Analyzing a Listed Company's Multi-Year Annual Reports Site
FinDeepResearch Reporting Benchmark Corporate Financial Analysis Site
FinResearchBench Reporting Framework Logic Tree based Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation Framework -
Fraud-R1 Fraud Benchmark LLMs' Resistance to Fraud GitHub
MultiAgentFraudBench Fraud Simulation Financial-Fraud Simulation GitHub
FIN-Bench Regulatory Benchmark LLM Jailbreaks under Regulatory Criteria GitHub
Finova Multiple Benchmark Financial Operable and Verifiable Agent Benchmark GitHub
FinMaster Multiple Benchmark Full-Pipeline Financial Workflows Site

Conclusion

In this survey, we systematically review and synthesize prior studies to establish Agentic FinTech as a unified paradigm for designing, implementing, and evaluating LLM-powered financial agent systems.

Overall, this survey provides a comprehensive reference and conceptual framework for advancing research and practice toward trustworthy, effective, and industry-ready Agentic FinTech systems.

Citation

@article{wu2026agenticfintech,
  title   = {Agentic FinTech: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Agents in Finance in the Era of LLMs},
  author  = {Wu, Yaxiong and Li, Yixuan},
  journal = {SSRN},
  year    = {2026},
  month   = jan,
  note    = {Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6136529},
  doi     = {10.2139/ssrn.6136529}
}

© 2026 Yaxiong Wu. Created with CodeX.